Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|
Abzan Doubling , Dimir Bounce , Dimir Control , Dimir Faeries , Dimir Flash , Dimir Midrange , DImir Tempo , Esper Midrange , Golgari Deathtouch , Golgari Demons
Gix, Yawgmoth Praetor ranks #407 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 100%).
Black average: 73.4%
Performance compared to other Black cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Gix, Yawgmoth Praetor is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: N/A (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Faebloom Trick | Instant | 56 | 60.7% | 6 |
Oildeep Gearhulk | Artifact Creature — Construct | 5 | 58.6% | 0 |
Floodpits Drowner | Creature — Merfolk | 108 | 58.3% | 18 |
Azure Beastbinder | Creature — Rat Rogue | 13 | 57.8% | 4 |
Disfigure | Instant | 7 | 57.8% | 0 |
Spectral Sailor | Creature — Spirit Pirate | 29 | 57.6% | 7 |
Phantom Interference | Instant | 109 | 56.5% | 18 |
Spell Stutter | Instant | 14 | 55.2% | 1 |
Spyglass Siren | Creature — Siren Pirate | 136 | 54.2% | 19 |
Tishana's Tidebinder | Creature — Merfolk Wizard | 136 | 53.9% | 19 |
Cards that perform better with Gix, Yawgmoth Praetor than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Dimir Midrange | 140 | 6.8% | 54.3% |
Orzhov Lifegain | 9 | 11.4% | 7.1% |
Golgari Midrange | 5 | 0.6% | 26.7% |
Rakdos Sacrifice | 3 | 3.9% | 36.3% |
Unclassified | 3 | 1.5% | 20.0% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.